| 2.1 National Project for Supply Chain Information System Standardization |
| 2.1.1 Project Outline |
|
EDI in the retail industry in Japan started with the EOS (Electronic Ordering System) that became widespread
in the supermarket industry after the JCA Protocol (*1) was drawn up in 1980. But because this slow data communications
protocol came into use among so many trade partners, it has been impossible to replace the
protocol with the latest Internet communications despite the rapid progress of IT thereafter.
Recently the limitations of the use of the JCA Protocol began to be realized as the supply of communications
equipment supporting the protocol was discontinued. The problems of the protocol were also pointed out,
such as the fact that the data format transmitted by the JCA Protocol (a fixed length format) differed among
various types of retail business and the difficulty of adding data items according to changing environments.
To resolve these problems, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) conducted Supply Chain
Information System Standardization Project for six years from 2003 to 2008 and urged the supply chains in
Japan to increase their efficiency. Supply chains in Japan are composed of three groups-product manufacturers,
wholesalers and retailers. Because the three groups did not succeed in cooperating on the exchange of
information, supply chains suffered such problems as a lack of good-selling products and the piling up of
inventories of poor-selling products. The project aimed at standardizing the EDI and enabling cooperation in
continuous information exchange among businesses, thereby creating an optimal mechanism capable of providing
the highest value added to the consumer. In June 2005, the two trade associations of supermarkets in
Japan that felt a sense of crisis about the maintenance of the EDI system-the Japan Chain Stores Association
and the Japan Supermarkets Association-held a joint meeting on information systems, and this accelerated
the establishment and diffusion of a new EDI standard using Internet technology.
After the pilot was completed, the participating retailers started to adopt the new EDI system using the Ryutsu
BMS. Because the types of Product categories have increased, it has been possible for supermarkets to apply
the Ryutsu BMS to the EDI for a majority of the products they handle. As a result, businesses adopting the
Ryutsu BMS are gradually increasing, and it is expected that three years from now, over a half of Japan’s supermarkets
will change over from the JCA Protocol to the Ryutsu BMS.
*1.JCA Protocol: Communications standard protocol for pull-type message transmission between the client and server using the BSC non-transparent mode. It can use both public circuit (2400 bps) and DDX circuit (9600 bps). It cannot transmit binary data, such as Kanji characters. *2. Ryutsu is Japanese equivalent of supply and demand chain, typically consists of three groups; Manufacturers, Wholesalers and Retailers. |
| 2.1.2 Examination and creation of the EDI standard |
About 80% of retail businesses in Japan are small and medium in size, and these businesses are important in
the diffusion of the standard EDI. Behind the fact that the EOS using the JCA Protocol was adopted so widely
were the activities of those various network service providers who provided support to these SMEs. |
| 2.1.3 Examination of security measures and communications protocols |
|
The Ryutsu BMS uses various relay servers to exchange messages via the Internet. Therefore, it faces such risks
as wiretapping, malignant alteration or spoofing at these relay servers. Examination was started in 2006 on
security measures using electronic certificates that would effectively eliminate these risks. *3. JX Protocol: Communications standard protocol for pull-type message transmission using the international standard SOAP-RPC. It can be used on the Internet. It can transmit Kanji characters and attached images, too. |
| 2.1.4 Examination of the maintenance and management system of the standard and publicity and diffusion activities |
|
After the standard was established, steady efforts would be important to maintain and manage as well as publicize
and diffuse it. If the standard were left as it is, it would not be revised according to increased applications
and each company would interpret it as they liked, ultimately resulting in a situation where the standard
would no longer be a standard. Thus examination were made as to what functions and organizations were
needed to carry out such tasks as the revision and publication of the standard and promotion of the such revision. |



